Who is responsible for proving their case in a legal dispute? In China’s legal system, the burden of proof determines which party must provide convincing evidence to support their claims.
Traditionally, the party making the accusation carries this responsibility, but Chinese law has evolved, and in some cases, the burden can shift.
This shift plays a major role in civil cases, trade disputes, and product liability claims, impacting legal strategies and case outcomes.
Understanding how China’s burden of proof works is essential for businesses, legal professionals, and anyone navigating the country’s legal system.
Let’s break it down.
Understanding the Burden of Proof in China
In China’s legal system, the burden of proof refers to the responsibility of providing sufficient evidence to support a claim in court.
It plays a crucial role in determining how cases are handled and decided. While it shares some similarities with other legal systems, China’s approach has unique features that shape legal proceedings.
Definition: Burden of Proof in China
In China’s legal system, the burden of proof refers to the responsibility of providing sufficient evidence to support a claim in court.
Generally, the party making the claim must present convincing evidence to prove their case.
However, in certain situations, the burden may shift to the opposing party to disprove the allegations.
If a fact in dispute is not supported by enough evidence, the court may reject the claim. This adverse outcome falls on the party who failed to meet their burden of proof.
The distribution rule of the burden of proof determines which party is responsible for proving a disputed fact in legal proceedings.
How It Differs from Western Legal Systems
1. Initial Burden of Proof
- The party making a claim must present sufficient evidence first.
- This is called the "initial burden", meaning they need to establish a valid case before the court considers shifting the responsibility.
2. Shifting the Burden of Proof
- Once the claim is established, the burden can shift to the opposing party.
- The defendant must provide counter-evidence to challenge or disprove the claim.
3. Court’s Role in Evidence Collection
- China follows a civil law tradition, meaning courts play a more active role in investigating evidence.
- Unlike in common law systems (U.S., U.K.), where parties collect and present evidence independently, Chinese courts can request additional evidence to ensure a fair trial.
4. Difference from Common Law Systems
- In common law systems, the burden of proof generally remains with the claimant throughout the case.
- In China, judges may intervene, assess evidence, and shift the burden if necessary, making the process more collaborative than adversarial.
Knowing how China’s burden of proof system works is essential for businesses, legal professionals, and individuals involved in legal disputes.
The shifting burden and court involvement make it distinct from Western practices, requiring a different legal strategy for success.
Burden of Proof in Chinese Civil Law Cases

In Chinese civil law, the burden of proof decides who must provide evidence to support their claims in court.
While it usually falls on the plaintiff, certain cases allow for a shifting burden, ensuring fairness in disputes where one party has better access to evidence.
Who Bears the Burden of Proof?
The Plaintiff (Claimant):
- In most civil cases, the plaintiff must prove their claim. This follows the principle "Who advocates, who proves."
- Example: In a contract dispute, the plaintiff must show that the contract was breached by providing supporting evidence.
When the Burden Shifts to the Defendant:
- In product liability cases, the manufacturer must prove the product was not defective.
- In wrongful termination cases, the employer may need to prove that the dismissal was lawful.
- In environmental damage cases, companies may be required to prove their operations did not cause harm.
Shifting Burden of Proof
Sometimes, the Chinese courts shift the burden from the plaintiff to the defendant, especially when the defendant has control over key evidence.
This ensures fairness in cases where the plaintiff cannot easily access critical information.
Common examples of burden shifting:
- Product liability – Manufacturers must prove a product was safe.
- Environmental damage – Companies must show they did not cause harm.
- Employment disputes – Employers must justify dismissals when challenged.
📣 Also Read: Employment Contract in China: Guide for Employers and Employees
Evidence Standards in Civil Cases
Chinese courts accept a variety of evidence types, but documentary evidence is often preferred over oral testimony, especially in commercial disputes.
Types of evidence accepted:
- Documentary evidence (contracts, receipts, written agreements)
- Witness testimony (statements from individuals involved)
- Expert opinions (specialist assessments in technical cases)
- Electronic data (emails, online transactions, digital records)
Key considerations:
- Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible, similar to Western legal systems.
- Courts place higher importance on written documents than verbal claims.
Understanding how China’s burden of proof system works helps businesses and individuals navigate legal disputes effectively.
Whether you are filing a claim or defending against one, knowing who is responsible for providing evidence can shape your legal strategy and improve your chances of success.
Burden of Proof in Chinese Criminal Law

In Chinese criminal law, the burden of proof decides who must prove their case in court. Typically, the prosecution must establish a defendant’s guilt, but in some cases, the defense may also have to present evidence to support their claims.
Presumption of Innocence in China
China follows the principle of "innocent until proven guilty," meaning a defendant should not be punished unless guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
However, in practice, this principle is not always consistently applied.
- In theory: Courts should only convict if the prosecution proves guilt with strong and clear evidence.
- In reality: Some trials rely heavily on prosecution arguments, with defendants facing challenges in fully exercising their legal rights.
- Ongoing reforms: Efforts are being made to strengthen the presumption of innocence and ensure fairer trials.
Prosecution's Burden vs. Defense Strategies
In most criminal cases:
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt using evidence such as confessions, forensic reports, and witness testimonies.
The defense does not need to prove innocence but must highlight weaknesses in the prosecution’s case to create doubt.
Common defense strategies include:
- Questioning the legality of confessions (e.g., obtained under duress).
- Challenging the reliability of forensic evidence.
- Providing alternative explanations for the allegations.
When the Burden of Proof Shifts to the Defense
In some cases, the defendant may need to provide evidence to justify their actions:
- Economic crimes (fraud, corruption):
- Defendants may have to prove the legitimacy of financial transactions to counter fraud allegations.
- National security cases:
- The prosecution may operate with lower evidence requirements, putting more pressure on the defense.
- The government may justify this by citing national security interests, making it harder for defendants to challenge the charges.
Understanding how the burden of proof works in China is critical for legal professionals, businesses, and individuals facing criminal proceedings.
Knowing who must prove what can help defendants build stronger cases and navigate the Chinese legal system more effectively.
📣 Also Read: Criminal Defense Lawyers in China
Burden of Proof in Business and Commercial Disputes in China

Businesses in China often face legal challenges where they must provide strong evidence to support their claims or defend against accusations.
The burden of proof plays a key role in product liability, intellectual property (IP) disputes, and labor conflicts.
1. Product Liability and Consumer Protection
In product liability cases, manufacturers must prove their products are safe and defect-free.
- Burden on manufacturers: Companies must show that harm was not caused by a defect in their product.
- Strong evidence needed: Proper safety testing, compliance records, and documentation can help manufacturers defend against claims.
- Failure to prove product safety can result in legal penalties, recalls, or compensation payments.
2. Intellectual Property (IP) Disputes
In IP cases, the party claiming infringement must provide clear proof of ownership and unauthorized use.
- Patent holders must prove ownership and demonstrate that their IP was infringed.
- The burden may shift if the accused claims the patent is invalid, requiring them to prove their argument.
- Chinese courts scrutinize IP cases carefully, particularly in trademark, copyright, and patent disputes.
- Detailed evidence such as registration documents, usage history, and expert reports is crucial for success.
📣 Also Read: How to Protect Your Intellectual Property (IP) in China
3. Labor Disputes and Employer Responsibility
In employment disputes, both employers and employees must provide evidence to support their claims.
- Employers must show proof for disciplinary actions, terminations, and wage disputes.
- Key evidence includes performance reviews, signed contracts, and incident reports.
- Employees may need to prove wrongful termination, workplace mistreatment, or unpaid wages.
- Maintaining clear records and contracts helps prevent disputes from escalating and ensures fair resolutions.
Understanding how the burden of proof works in business disputes allows companies to protect themselves legally, avoid costly penalties, and ensure compliance with Chinese laws.
Keeping thorough documentation and strong legal strategies is essential for navigating commercial disputes successfully.
Best Practices for Compliance and Risk Management
To effectively manage compliance and risk, it’s crucial to document all transactions thoroughly.
Keep records of contracts and communications. This habit ensures that you have evidence to support your position in case of any disputes.
Foreign businesses operating in China should be well-prepared for potential legal disputes. Understanding local laws is key. Engage local legal experts to help navigate regulations.
Key Practices:
- Maintain Comprehensive Records: Consistently keep detailed records of all business activities, including emails, contracts, and financial transactions.
- Understand Local Regulations: Familiarize yourself with China's legal framework. Stay updated on changes in laws, such as China's Personal Information Protection Law, to ensure compliance.
- Hire Local Experts: Employ local legal professionals to guide you on legal obligations. Their insights can help you avoid pitfalls and respond effectively if litigation arises.
- Regular Training: Provide staff with regular training on legal compliance and risk management best practices. This ensures everyone is aware of their responsibilities.
- Adapt to Changes: Be prepared to revise your compliance strategies in response to new regulations and shifts in the business environment.
Implementing these practices helps safeguard your business and ensures you’re prepared for any legal challenges that may arise.
📣 Also Read: China's Legal Framework for Foreign Business Operations
Final Thoughts
Understanding the burden of proof in China is important for businesses and individuals facing legal issues.
Whether it’s a contract dispute, product liability case, or business regulation, knowing who must provide evidence can affect the outcome.
Keeping clear records, expert reports, and strong legal support can help protect your rights.
By following the law and staying prepared, you can avoid risks and strengthen your case.
If you need help with legal proof and compliance, we at Choi & Partners are here to guide you. ☎️ Contact us today for expert legal support.
Frequently Asked Questions
In China, the burden of proof is crucial in legal proceedings, governing how evidence is presented and argued. You will explore how this burden shifts in different cases, standards of proof, and how new technologies are considered in courts.
How does the burden of proof shift in civil cases?
In civil cases, the burden of proof usually lies with the plaintiff, who must prove their claims by a preponderance of the evidence. However, the burden can shift to the defendant if they raise certain defenses or counterclaims. For example, in a breach of contract case, once the plaintiff proves the contract existed, the defendant might have to prove any alleged justifications for the breach.
What standard of proof is required in criminal cases?
In criminal cases, the standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This means the prosecution must provide evidence that leaves no reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt. It's a much higher standard than in civil cases because the stakes, such as loss of liberty, are much higher.
How does burden of proof work in medical malpractice cases in China?
In medical malpractice cases in China, the burden of proof generally lies with the plaintiff, who must prove that the medical provider deviated from accepted standards of care. However, if the plaintiff can show initial evidence of malpractice, the burden may shift to the medical provider to prove that they acted appropriately. This shift helps balance the scales in complex medical cases.
Can foreign companies shift the burden of proof to Chinese partners in contracts?
Foreign companies can include clauses in their contracts with Chinese partners to shift the burden of proof, but these clauses must be clearly defined and legally enforceable. It's advisable to consult with legal experts familiar with Chinese contract law to ensure such provisions are valid. Properly drafted contracts can help manage risks and clarify responsibilities.
What are the implications of Article 105 of China's Criminal Law?
Article 105 of China's Criminal Law deals with crimes against the state, such as subversion and inciting subversion. Violations can lead to severe penalties, including long prison sentences. This article is often cited in cases involving political dissent, making it crucial for individuals and organizations to understand its broad implications.
How do Chinese courts treat digital and blockchain evidence?
Chinese courts have increasingly recognized digital and blockchain evidence as valid forms of proof, provided they meet certain criteria for authenticity and reliability. Digital evidence must be collected and preserved in a manner that ensures its integrity. Blockchain technology, with its tamper-proof nature, is particularly valued for its ability to provide secure and verifiable records.
Subscribe to receive updates
Subscribe to receive the latest blog posts to your inbox every week.
